No. 18-152
Gregory Garmong v. Supreme Court of Nevada, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-rights civil-rights-complaint due-process exxon-mobil-precedent exxon-mobil-v-saudi-basic federal-jurisdiction judicial-review ninth-circuit rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine section-1983-complaint standing stare-decisis state-court-judgments
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Ninth Circuit may ignore and refuse to follow this Court's precedent in application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which requires that the federal court determine whether the federal civil-rights Complaint seeks "review and rejection" of the underlying state-court judgments, and on that basis affirm the dismissal of the civil-rights Complaint.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit may ignore and refuse to follow this Court's precedent in application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which requires that the federal court determine whether the federal civil-rights Complaint seeks 'review and rejection' of the underlying state-court judgments
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-08-24
Waiver of right of respondents Nevada, et al. to respond filed.
2018-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 5, 2018)
Attorneys
Gregory Garmong
Gregory Garmong — Petitioner
Supreme Court of Nevada, et al.