No. 18-1525

Jose Andrade v. City of Hammond, Indiana, et al.

Lower Court: Indiana
Docketed: 2019-06-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-amendments due-process ex-post-facto ex-post-facto-law ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel ineffective-representation property-rights sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Indiana Supreme Court decided an issue without determining the effect of ex post facto law, which affected petitioner's property and due process rights under the Fifth (5th) and Fourteenth (14th) Amendments of the United States Constitution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Indiana Supreme Court decided an issue — without determining the effect of ex post facto law, which affected petitioner’s property and due process rights under the Fifth (5th) and Fourteenth (14th) Amendments of the United States Constitution. Whether the Indiana Supreme Court was foreclosed from considering facts presented in the record of the lower court due to any waiver by petitioner’s attorney(s) — which constituted ineffective representation thereby denying petitioner’s right to counsel under the Sixth (6th) Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-14
Waiver of right of respondents City of Hammond, et al. to respond filed.
2019-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 10, 2019)

Attorneys

City of Hammond, et al.
David C. JensenEichhorn & Eichhorn, LLP, Respondent
David C. JensenEichhorn & Eichhorn, LLP, Respondent
Jose Andrade
John Horace DavisATTORNEY JOHN H. DAVIS, Petitioner
John Horace DavisATTORNEY JOHN H. DAVIS, Petitioner