Michael A. Katz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Cellco Partnership, dba Verizon Wireless
Arbitration DueProcess FifthAmendment Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri ClassAction
Whether Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) § 3 requires the district court to stay the action after it compels arbitration of all claims and a stay is requested by one of the parties
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) § 3 requires the district court to stay the action after it compels arbitration of all claims and a stay is requested by one of the parties. 2. Whether the standard for voluntary consent prescribed in Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 135 S. Ct. 1932, 1948 (2015), applies under the FAA to the waiver of the constitutional rights (i) to the exercise of the Article III judicial power in connection with state law private rights brought within the jurisdiction of the federal courts, and (ii) to judicial review of nonArticle III rulings of law required under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.