No. 18-1558
Marshall Spiegel v. Corrine McClintic, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech freedom-of-expression law-enforcement-liability municipal-liability public-photography qualified-immunity standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the First Amendment protect a person's right to photograph or videotape in public?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Does the First Amendment protect a person’s right to photograph or videotape in public? If so, where officers threaten to arrest a person for photographing or videotaping in public does the First Amendment require a heightened pleading standard or particular mental state to hold the officer and municipality liable? Similarly, should municipalities have rules forbidding officers from arresting persons who photograph or videotape in public?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-22
Brief of respondent Corinne McClintic in opposition filed.
2019-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Corinne McClintic
Eugene E. Murphy Jr. — Murphy Law Group, LLC, Respondent
Marshall Spiegel
Marina Tramontozzi — Petitioner
Village of Wilmette
Michael R. Hartigan — Hartigan and O'Connor P.C., Respondent