Why did the Colorado courts refuse to seek the truth in this case?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Colorado refuse to seek the truth in my case, by overlooking the evident and documents presented to them. This case was consisted with numerous of errs by the state law. There where falsify, contradicting, misleading and conspiracy in this case. “If the lower court had presented the truth, in the beginning of this case it wouldn’t had went this far in court. The ICOA stated the ALJ err in his report and misapplied the burden of prove in his application. The Court Appeals overlooked the evident also. And the Colorado Supreme Court denied the case. 1. Why did it take eight days after my injuries, before seem by a worker’s comp. doctor? By the state law that’s a errs. 2. How long does it take to validate the true ina case? 3. How long a person should suffer before justice is done? 4. How can anyone falsify information on a legal document and the judges let it pass thought the court system? 5. Was there enough conspiracy noticed in this case? 6. Was there enough evident weigh to be proven? 7. Do you feel there’s no justification for rights? 8. Did the surgeon doctor provide enough evident in his report to prove these injuries did occur from the fall at work? 9. Why was my case denied? 10. How can your attorney know the (DIME) examiner and still send you to them, that’s conspiracy?