No. 18-1580

Craig Ross, et al. v. Board of Trustees of California State University

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights damages due-process duplicative-actions eeoc-investigation free-speech individual-capacity-suit preliminary-injunction sovereign-immunity standing title-vii
Key Terms:
EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can an earlier-commenced Title VII case against the State of California be foreclosed as duplicative of a later-commenced 42 USC §1981 / 42 USC §1983 case against State officials in their individual capacities?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Can an earlier-commenced Title VII case against ‘ the State of California, initiated with a request for a preliminary injunction during the pendency of the EEOC investigation, be foreclosed as duplicative of a later-commenced 42 USC §1981 / 42 USC §1983 case against State officials in their individual capacities? 1 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Craig Ross and Natalie Operstein respectfully petition for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in this matter.

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent Bd. of Trustees, CA State Univ. to respond filed.
2019-06-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 26, 2019)

Attorneys

Bd. of Trustees, CA State Univ.
Kenneth Charles JonesOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Craig Ross, et al.
Craig Ross — Petitioner