No. 18-1591

R. F., a Minor Child, By and Through Her Parents and Next Friends, E. F. and H. F., et al. v. Cecil County Public Schools

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: administrative-law due-process educational-benefit educational-rights fape free-appropriate-public-education hearing-officer idea individuals-with-disabilities-education-act-idea parental-participation procedural-safeguards special-education
Key Terms:
DueProcess EducationPrivacy Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a violation of the IDEA's procedures that significantly impedes parents' opportunity to participate in the decisionmaking process regarding the provision of a FAPE constitutes a denial of a FAPE

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED This case raises the question of whether, pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(E)(ii),' a hearing officer may find a denial of a free appropriate education solely because the school district’s violations of the Act’s procedural safeguards “significantly impeded the parents’ opportunity to participate in the decisionmaking process regarding the provision of a free appropriate public education to the parents’ child,” or whether the parents must prove separately and additionally that the child was denied a free appropriate education or deprived of educational benefit as a matter of fact. ' 20 U.S.C. § 1415(E)(ii) provides that, for procedural issues, a hearing officer may find that a child did not receive a free appropriate education “only if the procedural inadequacies (D impeded the child’s right to a free appropriate public education; (ID) significantly impeded the parents’ opportunity to participate in the decisionmaking process regarding the provision of a free appropriate public education to the parents’ child; or (II) caused a deprivation of education benefits.

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-12
Reply of petitioners R.F., a minor child, by and through her PARENTS, et al. filed.
2019-07-29
Brief of respondent Cecil Count y Public Schools in opposition filed.
2019-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Cecil Count y Public Schools
Rochelle Stutman EisenbergPessin Katz Law, P.A., Respondent
Rochelle Stutman EisenbergPessin Katz Law, P.A., Respondent
R.F., a minor child, by and through her PARENTS, et al.
Wayne Darryl SteedmanThe Steedman Law Group, Petitioner
Wayne Darryl SteedmanThe Steedman Law Group, Petitioner