R. F., a Minor Child, By and Through Her Parents and Next Friends, E. F. and H. F., et al. v. Cecil County Public Schools
DueProcess EducationPrivacy Privacy
Whether a violation of the IDEA's procedures that significantly impedes parents' opportunity to participate in the decisionmaking process regarding the provision of a FAPE constitutes a denial of a FAPE
QUESTION PRESENTED This case raises the question of whether, pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(E)(ii),' a hearing officer may find a denial of a free appropriate education solely because the school district’s violations of the Act’s procedural safeguards “significantly impeded the parents’ opportunity to participate in the decisionmaking process regarding the provision of a free appropriate public education to the parents’ child,” or whether the parents must prove separately and additionally that the child was denied a free appropriate education or deprived of educational benefit as a matter of fact. ' 20 U.S.C. § 1415(E)(ii) provides that, for procedural issues, a hearing officer may find that a child did not receive a free appropriate education “only if the procedural inadequacies (D impeded the child’s right to a free appropriate public education; (ID) significantly impeded the parents’ opportunity to participate in the decisionmaking process regarding the provision of a free appropriate public education to the parents’ child; or (II) caused a deprivation of education benefits.