John Anthony Gentry v. Tennessee, et al.
DueProcess
Whether a state's sovereign immunity is vitiated when the state government is no longer republican in character or form
QUESTIONS PRESENTED This is a profound case challenging Tennessee’s sovereignty, being used as a false cloak to usurp and subvert constitutionally protected rights so as to advance corrupted interests. This petition raises questions of constitutional and federal court authority, to effect reform of a state government that ; is no longer republican in character or form and whether attorneys, in collusion with judges, can violate constitutionally protected rights and perpetrate crimes under color of law with impunity. The facts of this case are not disputed and clearly evidence rights violations and federal crimes perpetrated against Petitioner by Respondents. The questions presented are: ; . 1. Whether a state’s sovereign immunity is vitiated when the state government is no longer republican in character or form. 2. Whether a citizen of a state has a right to effect reform of the state government through suit in federal court, when a_ state’s constitution expressly guarantees its citizens an unalienable and indefeasible right to reform the government in such manner as they may think proper and the imperative for reform is undeniable. 3. Whether attorneys are held above the law when state and federal courts wrongfully abrogate jurisdiction, and ’-wrongfully deny fair due process, in cases alleging civil and criminal law ; and rights violations perpetrated by licensed attorneys. 1