No. 18-195

William S. Poff v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-14
Status: GVR
Type: Paid
Tags: exemption exemptions federal-seizure-law government-seizure incarceration-payments mandatory-victims-restitution-act restitution restitution-enforcement seizure service-connected-disability statutory-exemption statutory-interpretation substantial-resources veterans-disability-benefits
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether veterans disability benefits paid to an incarcerated individual constitute 'substantial resources' that can be seized under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Petitioner is a disabled military veteran currently serving a federal prison sentence. While incarcerated, Petitioner is entitled to approximately $133 a month in veterans disability benefits. At sentencing, the district court issued a restitution payment schedule based on Petitioner’s financial circumstances. Petitioner has fully complied with that payment schedule. Without notice, the government seized Petitioner’s accumulated monthly veterans disability benefits as payment toward the restitution he owes. Petitioner challenged the seizure as beyond the scope of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”). The questions presented are: 1. Under the MVRA, an individual who “receives substantial resources from any source, including inheritance, settlement, or other judgment, during a period of incarceration, .. . shall be required to apply the value of such resources to any restitution . . . still owed.” 18 U.S.C. § 3664(n). Does the periodic deposit of regular payments that were in effect at sentencing qualify as the receipt of windfall payments akin to “inheritance, settlement, or other judgment” that constitute “substantial resources” and can be immediately seized under the MVRA? 2.The MVRA_ exempts from _ restitution enforcement “[a]ny amount payable to an individual as a service-connected ... disability benefit.” 26 U.S.C. § 6334(a)(10); 18 U.S.C. § 8618. Do veterans disability benefits lose their exempt status when paid by the government?

Docket Entries

2019-02-08
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2019-01-07
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Lagos v. United States, 584 U. S. ___ (2018).
2018-11-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-28
Reply of petitioner William S. Poff filed. (Distributed)
2018-11-14
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-10-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 14, 2018.
2018-10-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2018 to November 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 15, 2018.
2018-09-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 13, 2018 to October 15, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 13, 2018)

Attorneys

United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
William S. Poff
Ashley Elizabeth JohnsonGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Ashley Elizabeth JohnsonGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner