No. 18-196

Francis Supeno, et al. v. Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources

Lower Court: Vermont
Docketed: 2018-08-14
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-penalty administrative-procedure appeal-rights civil-procedure due-process environmental-regulations fourth-amendment notice penalties property-access property-rights regulatory-criteria regulatory-enforcement
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the assessment of a penalty, in a proceeding entirely separate from and subsequent to a hearing on the underlying merits, constitutes a denial of due process where the potential magnitude of the penalty was not disclosed prior to the expiration of the deadline for appealing the decision on the merits, and was not reasonably ascertainable from the face of the pertinent regulatory criteria, leaving Petitioners unaware of the amount at stake and thereby depriving them of the opportunity to intelligently assess whether to appeal the decision on the merits.

2. Whether it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment for the State to impose an administrative penalty enhancement against a party found in violation of environmental regulations based on that party's refusal to allow state officials access to property without a court order.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the assessment of a penalty, in a proceeding entirely separate from and subsequent to a hearing on the underlying merits, constitutes a denial of due process

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-21
Waiver of right of respondent Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources to respond filed.
2018-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 13, 2018)

Attorneys

Francis Supeno, et al.
David Edward BondStrouse & Bond, PLLC, Petitioner
Secretary, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources
Benjamin Daniel BattlesOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent