No. 18-209

Ram Mehta v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2018-08-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: Civil-Procedure Civil-Rights constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment judicial-review search-and-seizure unlawful-arrest unlawful-search Unlawful-Search-and-Seizure
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Were the Petitioner's constitutional rights to be free from unlawful search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment and to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment violated by officers and then improperly upheld by the lower and appellate courts of California?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Were the Petitioner’s constitutional rights to be ; free from unlawful search and seizure under the : Fourth Amendment and to do due process under the Fourteenth Amendment violated by officers and then ; later improperly upheld by the lower and appellate courts of California?

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2018-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-23
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 17, 2018)

Attorneys

Ram Mehta
Ram Mehta — Petitioner