Was the 9th Circuit Panel's Decision a Politically Charged Decision that Assumed the Role of a Fact Finder, as Asserted by the Dissent?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW _L Was the 9th Circuit Panel’s Decision a Politically Charged Decision that Assumed the Role of a Fact Finder, as Asserted by the Dissent? . TIl.. Was the existence of an employment contract or the terms of such a contract for these two government attorneys a question of fact for a jury? . III. Was Petitioner Alexander's Notice of Claim . . : sufficient under the law? IV. Are the Issues Presented by this Case of : Exceptional Importance Due to the Precedent it Sets For Government Attorneys? ; V. Did an Arizona Justice Now on the 9 Circuit Demonstrate Bias at Oral Argument and Ignore His Prior Involvement with the State Court Action?