Whether the Court of Appeals so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings when it deliberately removed relevant and uncontested facts from a breach of contract case, denied that a party made an extensive argument based upon those facts, and then vacated a $4.6 million judgment against the insurance company on grounds that relies upon the absence of those facts

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Court of Appeals so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings when it deliberately removed relevant and uncontested facts from a breach of contract case, denied that a party made an extensive argument based upon those facts, and then vacated a $4.6 million judgment against the insurance company on grounds that relies upon the absence of those facts.