No. 18-256
Robert Bartlett, et al. v. Honeywell International, Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: cercla-preemption circuit-court-review circuit-court-summary-order civil-rights common-law-tort common-law-tort-claims congressional-intent cts-corp-v-waldburger due-process environmental-law judicial-precedent preemption statutory-interpretation torts toxic-exposure
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did CERCLA preempt petitioners' common law tort claims?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Did the Circuit Court’s Summary Order, which held _ that CERCLA preempts Petitioners’ common law tort claims, directly contradict this Court’s decision in CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 134 S. Ct. 2175 (2014), based on a plain reading of CERCLA’s statutory language and Congressional intent. 2) Did the Circuit Court’s err by applying the incorrect legal standard in deciding that CERCLA preempts Petitioners’ common law tort claims?
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent Honeywell International, Inc. to respond filed.
2018-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 27, 2018)
Attorneys
Honeywell International, Inc.
Brian D. Israel — Arnold & Porter LLP, Respondent
Brian D. Israel — Arnold & Porter LLP, Respondent
Robert Bartlett, et al.
Kenneth F. McCallion — McCallion & Associates, Petitioner
Kenneth F. McCallion — McCallion & Associates, Petitioner