No. 18-34
Tags: capital-punishment eighth-amendment equal-protection fourteenth-amendment hurst-v-florida retroactivity ring-cutoff-formula ring-v-arizona
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the retroactivity formula created by the Florida Supreme Court pursuant to Hurst v. Florida, 136 S.Ct. 616 (2016) violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the retroactivity formula created by the Florida Supreme Court pursuant to Hurst v. Florida violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-02
Brief of respondent State of Florida in opposition filed. (8/16/2018)
2018-05-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Pablo San Martin
Gustavo Jesus Garcia-Montes — Gustavo J. Garcia-Montes, PA, Petitioner
State of Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
The State of Florida
Scott Andrew Browne — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent