No. 18-34
Tags: capital-punishment eighth-amendment equal-protection fourteenth-amendment hurst-v-florida retroactivity ring-cutoff-formula ring-v-arizona
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the retroactivity formula created by the Florida Supreme Court pursuant to Hurst v. Florida violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the retroactivity formula created by the Florida Supreme Court pursuant to Hurst v. Florida, 136 S.Ct. 616 (2016) violate the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-02
Brief of respondent State of Florida in opposition filed. (8/16/2018)
2018-05-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Pablo San Martin
Gustavo Jesus Garcia-Montes — Gustavo J. Garcia-Montes, PA, Petitioner
Gustavo Jesus Garcia-Montes — Gustavo J. Garcia-Montes, PA, Petitioner
State of Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
The State of Florida
Scott Andrew Browne — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Scott Andrew Browne — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent