No. 18-343
Raiden J. Andrews v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review chapman-v-california constitutional-error constitutional-provision-involved constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment harmless-error harmless-error-standard military-justice military-justice-system prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-10-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in failing to apply the harmless error standard to the prosecution's improper arguments
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the lower court erred in failing to apply the harmless error standard to the prosecution’s improper arguments.
Docket Entries
2018-10-29
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
2018-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 18, 2018)
Attorneys
Raiden J. Andrews
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent