No. 18-350

Lamar Sequan Brown v. South Carolina

Lower Court: South Carolina
Docketed: 2018-09-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: abandonment abandonment-doctrine cell-phone-privacy cell-phones digital-data fourth-amendment privacy reasonable-expectation-of-privacy reasonable-expectation-privacy search-and-seizure search-warrant warrant-requirement
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2018-11-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether police must obtain a warrant before searching cell phone data on a lost but passcode-protected phone

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Fourth Amendment doctrine permits police to freely search ordinary objects deemed “abandoned.” No suspicion, or warrant, or exigency is required. But cell phones are not ordinary objects because of the trove of personal data they carry. Riley v. California, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 2489-91 (2014) (holding that cell phone data fundamentally differs from other contents of a person’s pocket, and thus requires a warrant to search it after an arrest). For this reason, Florida courts have correctly ruled that police must obtain a warrant before searching the data on a lost, passcode-protected cell phone. On the other hand, the South Carolina Supreme Court here treated a lost cell phone as no different than a wallet or overcoat. It upheld a warrantless search of the data on a lost, passcodeprotected cell phone. The question presented here is whether police must obtain a warrant before searching cell phone data on a lost but passcode-protected phone.

Docket Entries

2018-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2018.
2018-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent South Carolina to respond filed.
2018-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 18, 2018)

Attorneys

Lamar Sequan Brown
Matthew Allen FitzgeraldMcGuireWoods LLP, Petitioner
Matthew Allen FitzgeraldMcGuireWoods LLP, Petitioner
South Carolina
William M. Blitch Jr. — Respondent
William M. Blitch Jr. — Respondent