No. 18-366

Roberta Golden, et vir v. George Peterson

Lower Court: Massachusetts
Docketed: 2018-09-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: contract due-process equitable-principles foreclosure fraud fraudulent-mortgage legal-mandates mortgage mortgage-fraud property-rights real-property standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Were Petitioners denied due process when the state refused to allow Petitioners to have a hearing on the nature of the illegality and instead conflated equitable principles with legal mandates to preclude any hearing

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Were Petitioners denied due process when the state refused to allow Petitioners to have a hearing on the nature of the illegality and instead conflated equitable principles with legal mandates to preclude any hearing. The result is the enforcement of an illegal contract involving a fraudulent mortgage on the subject real property and the pending loss of the property in a foreclosure sale.

Docket Entries

2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 22, 2018)

Attorneys

Robert Golden, et al.
Roberta Golden — Petitioner
Roberta Golden — Petitioner