Whether the Second Circuit erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Fifth Circuit, that a robbery in which an individual victim is forced to withdraw his own money from an ATM has a sufficient effect on interstate commerce to satisfy the commerce' element of the Hobbs Act

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Second Circuit erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Fifth Circuit, that a robbery in which an individual victim is forced to withdraw his own money from an ATM has a sufficient effect on interstate commerce to satisfy the “commerce” element of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a).