Whether the Florida Supreme Court and the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida violated the due process protections of the 5th and 14th Amendments by allowing the Third DCA to block the Florida Supreme Court from reviewing an arbitrary and capricious per curiam affirmance and by refusing to grant disqualification when there are objective reasons to question its impartiality in foreclosure appeals raising fraudulent misconduct

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Florida Supreme Court and the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida (“the Third DCA”) violated the due process protections of the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U. S. Constitution by allowing the Third DCA to block the Florida Supreme Court from reviewing an arbitrary and capricious per curiam affirmance (“PCA”) of a final judgment of foreclosure procured using false evidence in an unconscionable scheme to defraud the courts, the federal regulators and the USS. Department of Justice that violated the $25 Billion National Mortgage Settlement by the continued use of fraudulent evidence in foreclosures? Whether the Florida Supreme Court and the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida violated the due process protections of the 5th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by refusing to grant disqualification when there are objective reasons to question its impartiality in foreclosure appeals raising this same fraudulent misconduct? 1