Jesse J. Davis, Jr., et ux. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association
DueProcess Punishment
Whether the sanctions imposed by the Connecticut Appellate Court violate the petitioners' constitutional rights, including their rights to due process, equal protection, public trial, petition for redress of grievances, and an impartial court
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW All of the following Constitutional Rights violations ~ were raised to the Connecticut Supreme Court 0 on the Motion for Certification to Appeal dated , 01-19-18 which was denied on 03-28-18 (page AS) : and the Motion for reconsideration dated : 04-06-18, filed 04-06-18 and 04-17-18, which was a denied on 06-20-18 (page A4). Many of the : Constitutional Rights violations were raised to the ‘ Appellate Court on multiple Motions including the : Motion for reconsideration filed on 12-06-17 i (page A 11) and denied on 01-02-18 (page A13). i 1. Sanctions violation of Constitutional Rights. , Sanctions (page A2) Violate First, 5th and 14th Amendments of United States Constitution : : (pages A14, A15) and would violate the Bo, Petitioners Constitutional Rights to Petition the io . Government for Redress of Grievances, Right i to Due Process of Law, Right to The Equal a Protection of the Laws, Right against attempts _ to Abridge the ‘privileges or immunities of a citizens of the United States. The Appellate vo Court showing favoritism to Respondents by : . unjustly and unfairly granting the Respondents P request to place unjustified Sanctions . : (page A2) against the Petitioners without any i : proofs or Legal Basis, is a attempt by the Courts, | . : ‘and the Respondents to Illegally block and i hinder the Petitioners defense. The Petitioners : CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ae . ~ i . ii . ; have done nothing wrong and have only , obeyed and followed the Law, Court Rules , and Procedures and cannot be the subject of any Sanctions or unjust and unfair Restrictions. ; 2. Violations of Right to Public Trial and Public . ; Information. ; The Appellate Court's refusal to provide the ' requested Public Information of the Judges Reasons, Explanations and Legal Basis aa ; (pages A13, A11) for Denial of the Automatic Stay of Practice Book Section 71-7 (page A18) ; has made the Judges Reasons Explanations 7 and Legal Basis a Secret which make the Judges guilty of holding Secret Trials which is a ; Violation of the Petitioners Constitutional Right , to a Public Trial as stated in the 6th : Amendment of the United States Constitution. : 3. Violation of Right to the Equal Protection of the Laws. The Court's actions of Granting all of the Respondents Request even when they are in violation of laws, Court Rules, Procedures and Time Limits, and the Court's actions of Denying, Dismissing or ignoring all of the Requests by the . Petitioners even when they are in Compliance, ; (page A11) is a Constitutional Violation of the Equal Protection of the Laws, as stated in the 14th Amendment of United States Constitution. CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE iti 4. Violation of Right to Petition the Government ; for Redress of Grievances. . The Appellant Court dismissed the Appeal on 11-09-16 (page Aé) by trying to make the Appeal! about the Foreclosure when in fact the Appeal was about Errors made by the Judge, as Raised on the Preliminary Statement ; of Issues dated 10-21-16 (page A8). The : Reconsideration of he Appeal was Denied on 12-01-16 (page A7) without any reasons or . explanations. This seem to be a effort to give . the Respondents and the Big Banks a a : . advantage by denying the Petitioners the right to Appeal which is a Constitutional ; Violation of the Petitioners, Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances, as stated in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. . 5. Violation of Right to Due Process of Law. : The refusal of the Court to investigate or address errors made by the Judge and mc , ignoring the Court Documents, Objections : and Proofs of the Respondents by having ; Court Rulings, Court Rules and Procedures which block and hinder the Petitioners from making an Appeal while allowing the Big Banks or Respondents to proceed to take the Petitioners Property, is a Constitutional : Violation of Due Process of Law as stated in the 5th and14th Amendments (pages 14, 15). 3 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE iv 6