No. 18-391
Tags: adversarial-hearing bail-denial bail-restrictions clear-proof criminal-procedure due-process facial-unconstitutionality pretrial-detention salerno sexual-assault united-states-v-salerno
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FirstAmendment CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-01-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Arizona Supreme Court err in holding that United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987), prohibits a State from denying bail to an arrestee when a judge, after a full adversarial hearing, finds clear proof that the arrestee committed sexual assault?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Arizona Supreme Court err in holding that United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987), prohibits a State from denying bail to an arrestee when a judge, after a full adversarial hearing, finds clear proof that the arrestee committed sexual assault? 2. Did the Arizona Supreme Court err in joining a growing number of jurisdictions that hold a statute facially unconstitutional even if it is capable of constitutional application in some circumstances?
Docket Entries
2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-14
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Michael C. Dorf, et al. GRANTED.
2019-01-14
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Arizona Voice for Crime Victims, Inc., et al. GRANTED.
2018-12-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-24
Reply of petitioner Arizona filed.
2018-12-19
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Guy James Goodman.
2018-12-19
Brief of respondent Guy James Goodman in opposition filed.
2018-11-16
Letter reply in support of request for extension filed.
2018-11-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including December 19, 2018.
2018-11-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 6, 2018 to January 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-15
Letter response to respondent's request for extension filed.
2018-11-06
Response Requested. (Due December 6, 2018)
2018-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-29
Brief amici curiae of The States of Texas, et al. filed. (Distributed) (Amended version submitted October 30, 2018)
2018-10-29
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Michael C. Dorf, et al. (Distributed)
2018-10-29
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Arizona Voice for Crime Victims, Inc., et al.
2018-10-22
Waiver of right of respondent Guy James Goodman to respond filed.
2018-09-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 29, 2018)
2018-08-08
Application (18A147) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 24, 2018.
2018-07-26
Application (18A147) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 23, 2018 to September 24, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Arizona
Dominic Emil Draye — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Arizona Voice for Crime Victims, Inc., Memory of Victims Everywhere to Rescue Justice, and National Crime Victim Law Institute
Allyson Ho — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Amicus
Guy James Goodman
Nicholaus Anthony Podsiadlik — Maricopa County Public Defender, Respondent
Michael C. Dorf and Kevin C. Walsh
Elbert Lin — Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Amicus
THE STATES OF TEXAS, NEBRASKA, ARKANSAS, COLORADO, GEORGIA, LOUISIANA, AND NEW MEXICO