Whether a prisoner whose Section 2255 motion challenging the applicability of a statutory minimum was denied based on circuit precedent may later seek habeas relief on the ground that the circuit's interpretation of the relevant statutes has changed

QUESTION PRESENTED Under 28 U.S.C. 2255, a federal prisoner has the opportunity to collaterally attack his sentence once on any ground cognizable on collateral review, with “second or successive” attacks limited to certain claims that indicate factual innocence or that rely on constitutional-law decisions made retroactive by this Court. 28 U.S.C. 2255(h). Under 28 U.S.C. 2255(e), an “application for a writ of habeas corpus [under 28 U.S.C. 2241] in behalf of a prisoner who is authorized to apply for relief by motion pursuant to” Section 2255 “shall not be entertained * * * unless it *** appears that the remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.” The question presented is whether a prisoner whose Section 2255 motion challenging the applicability of a statutory minimum was denied based on circuit precedent may later seek habeas relief on the ground that the circuit’s interpretation of the relevant statutes has changed. (I)