No. 18-427

Masoud Bamdad v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-03
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: agency-policy controlled-substances court-jurisdiction criminal-procedure defective-indictment due-process fed.r.civ.p.-54(b) final-judgment habeas-corpus habeas-proceedings interstate-commerce jurisdiction medical-practice procedural-rules
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a habeas court must adjudicate all claims of a habeas petitioner before making a final judgment and closing the case, or else the judgment is invalid and does not end the action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Should a habeas proceedings court adjudicate all claims of a habeas petitioner before making its final ; judgment and closing the case, or otherwise such judgment is invalid and does not end the action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b)? 2. Does a defective indictment result in a court : losing its jurisdiction over a criminal defendant? 3. Whether due process demands government agents follow their own agency policy and procedures during their investigation stage. 4. Where there is no evidence of interstate com: merce violations in a case of a physician who was charged and convicted of distribution of controlled substances, while he was practicing legitimate pain management based on his licensing agency guidelines, do federal authorities have jurisdiction over such a case? oii ‘

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2018-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-29
2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2017-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 2, 2018)

Attorneys

Masoud Bamdad
Masoud Bamdad — Petitioner
Masoud Bamdad — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent