No. 18-434

Dawn Mosby v. Matthew G. Parilla

Lower Court: New York
Docketed: 2018-10-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction appellate-procedure civil-practice civil-procedure due-process judicial-discretion Judicial-review Legislative-authority legislative-intent notice-of-appeal separation-of-powers timeliness-of-appeal
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Appellate Division, Second Department, violated the New York State Constitution's separation of powers doctrine by permitting a late appeal and granting relief to the non-appealing party

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED: 1. Whether the Appellate Division, Second Department, part of the New York State Judiciary, violated the State Constitution’s separation of powers doctrine by having acted in the place and stead of the Legislative branch of the government, when it effectively amended the strictest of all its Civil Practice Rules and Law by ° permitting Defendant to litigate his appeal despite the fact that he filed a three months late notice of appeal, and then, it impermissibly, allowed him to appear and argue not only the merits of the dental malpractice action, but to obtain affirmative relief as well, something only the New York State Legislature had the power and authority to have enacted? i . (b) LIST OF ALL

Docket Entries

2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-01
Waiver of right of respondent Matthew G. Parilla to respond filed.
2018-07-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2018)

Attorneys

Dawn Mosby
Judith Ellen StoneJudith Ellen Stone, Esq., Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Judith Ellen StoneJudith Ellen Stone, Esq., Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Matthew G. Parilla
Jennine A. GerrardMalapero Prisco & Klauber LLP, Respondent
Jennine A. GerrardMalapero Prisco & Klauber LLP, Respondent