Can the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine bar federal court jurisdiction under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b), 42 U.S.C. 1983, or 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq. when officers of the state probate courts, its agents, municipal officers and banking officers act under the color of law outside their limited authority to take property from the rightful owner through acts of fraud?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Can the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine bar federal court jurisdiction under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b), 42 U.S.C. 1983, or 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq. when officers of the state probate courts, its agents, municipal officers and banking officers act under the color of law outside their limited authority to take property from the rightful owner through acts of fraud? 2. Is it an abuse of authority to deny de novo review when a district court relies on misstated facts in an unpublished state court’s opinion issued without notice, without review, when the state court lacked statutory authority to exercise jurisdiction over the parties to issue the opinion and when best evidence rebuts the facts contained in the opinion issued without any opportunity to be heard in any court and when equal justice requires the same rights to be maintained under the same circumstances? i