Whether certiorari is warranted to correct disobedience by the state courts and lower federal courts if their decisions are contrary to clearly established Supreme Court law and the United States Constitution where the Petitioner was denied the federal right to due process and he has no other adequate remedy at law to challenge his ongoing illegal confinement by the Respondent after the lawful correct sentence expiration date

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether certiorari is warranted to correct disobedience by the state | ; courts and lower federal courts if their decisions are contrary to clearly _ established Supreme Court law and the United States Constitution where the / Petitioner was denied’the federal right to due process and he has no other . adequate remedy at law to challenge his ongoing illegal confinement by the Respondent after the lawful correct sentence expiration date of 8-9-2014 assessed by the state jury under number 481656 and TDCJ #475245. 2. Whether certiorari is warranted where there is a presumption of vindictiveness to deny the Petitioner due process and habeas relief by the lower federal courts and the state courts when the factual circumstances . indicate a "reasonable likelyhood of vindictiveness" to conceal or improperly enforce unconstitutional retroactivity of state laws to illegally confine the Petitioner past his true and correct sentence maximum expiration date which is contrary to clearly established Supreme Court law and the ; United States Constitution. ‘aD