No. 18-5003
Rolando Mulet v. United States
IFP
Tags: 5th-amendment circuit-split constitutional-protection criminal-procedure fifth-amendment law-enforcement-questioning miranda miranda-rights pre-arrest pre-arrest-silence pre-miranda self-incrimination
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure Immigration
FifthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-11-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause protects a defendant's pre-arrest, pre-Miranda silence from being used as evidence at trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether or under what circumstances the Fifth Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause protects a defendant’s refusal to answer law enforcement questioning before he has been arrested or read his Miranda rights. i
Docket Entries
2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-09-28
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-08-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 28, 2018.
2018-08-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 29, 2018 to September 28, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-07-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 29, 2018.
2018-07-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 30, 2018 to August 29, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)
Attorneys
Rolando Mulet
Manuel Lazaro Casabielle — Manuel L. Casabielle, P.A., Petitioner
Manuel Lazaro Casabielle — Manuel L. Casabielle, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent