Is there a reasonable probability that had the Brady and Napue/Giglio violation been disclosed, the outcome of the trial would have been different?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW In this New York criminal case, the state trial court, the state appellate courts, the , Southern District court of New York, and the United States Second Circuit court of. ; . Appeals denied Petitioner Lawrence Dawkins post-conviction relief, Dawkins contends a that the New York courts reached this result only by disregarding firmly established . . precedents of this Court regarding ‘suppression of material evidence favorable to a defendant. ; : . a | I. Is there a reasonable probability that had the Brady and Napue/Giglio — violation been disclosed, the outcome of the trial would have been different? Il, Was There a Denial of a Fair Trial? II. Were fundamental principles of due process ignored by the New York state ; : . courts.in the rejection of Dawkins’ Brady and Napue/Giglio claim? os . IV. Did a United States court of appeals enter a decision in conflict with the , | . ; . decision of another United States court of appeals on the same important __ matter? : : ; Petitioner Lawrence Dawkins respectfully requests that this Court issue a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the New York State courts. : . : . ii “Ng