Whether Florida's limited retroactive application of its Eighth Amendment decision in Hurst v. State violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Florida’s limited retroactive application of its Eighth Amendment | decision in Hurst v. State violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments because i it arbitrarily uses as a cutoff date a 2002 decision that invalidated Arizona’s capital sentencing scheme under the Sixth Amendment, and results in the disparate i treatment of similarly situated individuals. ;