No. 18-5019

Bohdan G. Seniw v. Connecticut General Assembly, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2018-06-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process government-misconduct hipaa-violation hippa law-enforcement medical-information medical-privacy medical-records privacy public-records retaliation whistle-blower whistle-blower-protection whistleblower-protection
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

Why it was done Purposely ?

Why Enforce Whistle Blower Protection ?

I'm certain you will be hearing from him ( Edwin Gomes, Senator ) soon. Why it was done Intentionally ?

The office of Senator Marilyn Moore letter/correspondence October 26, 2016., Ms. Dorothy Lewis of Senator office.

Why it was done Deliberately ?

Christopher Rosario House of Representative Never Replyed back TO the THEN Police Commissioner, in the City of Bridgeport, Connecticut !, Police Commissioner SIMON Castillo

Why it was done on Purpose ?

Why my HIPPA , My Medical Information from a celiphone Stolen !, in MAY on or about 14th , 21st Sunday 2017

My (BO) MedicaL Illegally " E M P T Y " emptied on and We Seen! " E WI P T Y " . from a cellphone

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why it was done Purposely?

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Bohdan G. Seniw
Bohdan G. Seniw — Petitioner