No. 18-5019

Bohdan G. Seniw v. Connecticut General Assembly, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2018-06-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process government-misconduct hipaa-violation hippa law-enforcement medical-information medical-privacy medical-records privacy public-records retaliation whistle-blower whistle-blower-protection whistleblower-protection
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why it was done Purposely?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Why it was done Purposely ? Why Enforce Whistle Blower Protection ? I'm certain you will be hearing from him ( Edwin Gomes, Senator ) soon. Why it was done Intentionally ? The office of Senator Marilyn Moore October 26, 2016., Ms. Dorothy Lewis of Senator office. Why it was done Deliberately ? ; Christopher Rosario House of Representative Never Replyed back TO the THEN Police Commissioner, in the City of Bridgeport, Connecticut !, Police Commissioner SIMON Castillo ! ! why it was done on Purpose ? Why my HIPPA , My Medical Information from _a_ cellphone Stolen !, in MAY on or about 14th , 21st Sunday 2017 ! ? My (BO) MedicaL Illegally "EMPTY" emptied on and We Seen! , "EMPTY" ., from _a_ cellphone ! !

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Bohdan G. Seniw
Bohdan G. Seniw — Petitioner
Bohdan G. Seniw — Petitioner