Whether a judge who is named as an adverse party opponent is prohibited from presiding over the proceedings in which he is a defendant, and whether the failure to recuse in such circumstances constitutes structural error

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) Is an individual, who is named an adverse party opponent, allowed to sit as a Judge over the very Proceeding in oe , which he is named a defendant, or is he prohibited by law, ) . , statute, and the Constitution? . (2) If an adverse party opponent sits as a Judge over the proceedings in which he is named a defendant, refused to recuse himself, and rules in said proceedings, does this constitute structural error, which is not subjected to harmless error review? : (3) Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals err in using the. incorrect standard of review in matters concerning a Judge, who , was a former prosecutor, and possibly could have made important decisions or contributions in the Petitioner's case by not applying the objective bias standard of review as dictated by this United States Supreme Court's precedence?