No. 18-5035
Sandra Grazzini-Rucki v. Minnesota
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure coerced-testimony constitutional-law defense-evidence due-process false-statements jurisdiction prosecutorial-misconduct restitution standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Punishment Immigration
DueProcess FifthAmendment Punishment Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the prosecutor committed misconduct by allowing false statements and filing additional charges after a witness was coerced to recant testimony, whether the district court erred by excluding defense evidence, and whether the district court abused its discretion by changing restitution terms without following proper procedures
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)