No. 18-5038
IFP
Tags: administrative-law child-pornography circuit-court-split civil-procedure due-process equal-protection federal-rules-of-evidence-403 federal-rules-of-evidence-414 standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the differing applications of the Circuit Courts' balancing tests under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 414 resulted in a violation of the petitioner's rights afforded by the Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-08-29
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-07-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 29, 2018.
2018-07-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 30, 2018 to August 29, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)
Attorneys
United States, Joan
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent