No. 18-5044
Laurenano Angulo Riascos v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance section-2255 sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit erred in denying petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability to review the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit erred when it denied Petitioner's petition for issuance of a certificate of appealability to review the district court's denial of his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. . 2255 when Petitioner demonstrated constitutional rights violations in his attorney's ineffective representation. , ’ + ve ‘ ¢ ~-1
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-05-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 1, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent