No. 18-5056
Joshua D. Bouziden v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924e armed-career-criminal-act criminal-sentencing divisibility juror-unanimity modified-categorical-approach predicate-conviction prior-conviction sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment
HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a predicate prior conviction under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), is divisible for purposes of the modified categorical approach when the offense does not require juror unanimity on the method of commission
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented for Review Expressed in the Terms and Circumstances of the Case. Whether a predicate prior conviction under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), is divisible for purposes of the modified categorical approach when the offense does not require juror unanimity on the method of commission. 1 (b) List of all
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)
Attorneys
Joshua D. Bouziden
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent