No. 18-5062
Norman L. Hunter v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aged-offenses appellate-review career-offender civil-procedure criminal-history district-court-error due-process guideline-determination sentencing-enhancement sentencing-factors sentencing-guidelines standing writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in sentencing the petitioner as a career offender when the offenses used to enhance the sentence were aged and not considered part of the guideline determination
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Should a writ of certiorari be granted to determine whether the district court erred in sentencing Hunter as a career offender when the offenses utilized to enhance his sentence were aged and not considered part of the guideline determination? ii
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent