Did the trial court unconstitutionally deny Petitioner's request for an entrapment instruction?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Under the Due Process Clause, did the trial court unconstitutionally deny Petitioner's request/motion for an entrapment instruction when the record contained evidence of lack of predisposition and inducement? II. Whether Petitioner's Hobbs Act convictions in a reverse stash house sting lacked sufficient evidence establishing . that his conduct affected . interstate commerce, or would have affected interstate commerce, absent governmental intervention and fictitious concoction? III. Whether Petitioner's 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) convictions are in violation of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), where two of the four : possible predicate offenses for the conviction, specifically Hobbs Act robbery and Conspiracy, fail to qualify as a crime of violence or a drug trafficking offense? IV. Whether Petitioner's 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) conviction lacked evidence that his intrastate possession of a firearm had a substantial effect on interstate commerce?