Whether a state court may indefinitely postpone prosecution over the accused's objection by nolle-prosequi and re-indictment of the same charges, knowing the accused would remain in custody

No question identified. : QUESTION (5) PRESENTED |. Whether a state Court may benefit, gaming Ane advantage of a ceskact On ne Speedy Trial clock (ice indefinitely Post porin 9 prosecuticni, over Mane accessed Ob yecrron, WY NollcProseg and ceindickment of He Same entack charges, Knowing He accused Would Camara V9 custody 2 2. Whether a State Court may gain a cestart on tne Speedy Trial Choc by nolle-prosequy of Be Charges using Continuance Ceasons, Staking Tk would Fucther invests nore and ceindick accused, Over accused , ob yecrion, while Mae acevSed femained in tu stody under Hae Candirxiens of ke nolle -grosequs Charges, buk had or a Show Cause (nm Connechen 7 i] © Same Criminal episode) as ne selleprosequs Charges . ae 211JO aueAauy