No. 18-5088
IFP
Tags: death-penalty eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment hurst-v-florida judicial-review retroactivity sixth-amendment supremacy-clause
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Florida Supreme Court violate the Supremacy Clause and the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments in affirming Emanuel Johnson's judicially-determined death sentences and distinguishing him from the condemned whose sentences became final after June 24, 2002?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Florida Supreme Court violate the Supremacy Clause and the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments in affirming Emanuel Johnson’s death sentences and distinguishing him from the condemned whose sentences became final after June 24, 2002? i
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-01
Brief of respondent State of Florida in opposition filed.
2018-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2018)
2018-03-15
Application (17A985) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until July 2, 2018.
2018-03-14
Application (17A985) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 3, 2018 to July 2, 2018, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Emanuel Johnson
Margaret Scobey Russell — Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Petitioner
Margaret Scobey Russell — Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Petitioner
State of Florida
Scott Andrew Browne — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Scott Andrew Browne — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent