No. 18-5089
Kevin Khaaliq Beamon v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-3553(a) criminal-history criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-discretion sentencing-guidelines sentencing-upon-revocation sentencing-variance substance-addiction supervised-release upward-variance
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court may impose a significant upward variance at sentencing upon revocation of supervised release on an individual who had never before served a significant jail sentence and whose violation conduct all stemmed from substance addiction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a district court may impose a significant upward variance at sentencing upon revocation of supervised release on an individual who had never before served a significant jail sentence and whose violation conduct all stemmed from substance addiction.
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 1, 2018)
Attorneys
Kevin Khaaliq Beamon
Eric Joseph Brignac — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Eric Joseph Brignac — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent