No. 18-5095
Tron Lakey Davis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: categorical-approach force generic-crime generic-robbery minimal-contact minimal-force robbery robbery-definition sentencing-enhancement sentencing-enhancements taylor-precedent taylor-v-united-states violent-crime
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy
Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether theft offenses requiring only minimal contact and no threat of violence satisfy the generic, contemporary meaning of robbery under the categorical approach
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether theft offenses requiring only minimal contact and no threat of violence satisfy the generic, contemporary meaning of robbery under the categorical approach to analyzing sentencing enhancements mandated by this Court in Taylor v. United States?
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent