No. 18-5098
Thaddeus Williams v. Cindi S. Curtin, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal certificate-of-appealability district-court-review due-process equitable-tolling habeas-corpus procedural-timeliness statutory-tolling
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court correctly determined that petitioner's habeas corpus petition was untimely; whether the blanket denial of his motion for certificate of appealability denied him the right to appeal and an opportunity to establish equitable or statutory tolling
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT CORRECTLY DETERMINED THAT PETITIONER'S HABEAS CORPUS PETITION WAS. UNTIMELY; WHETHER THE BLANKET -DENIAL OF HIS:' MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY DENIED HIM THE RIGHT TO APPEAL .AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO ESTABLISH EQUITABLE OR..STATUTORY TOLLING.
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent Cindi S. Curtin, Warden to respond filed.
2018-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2018)
Attorneys
Cindi S. Curtin, Warden
Aaron David Lindstrom — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Aaron David Lindstrom — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent