Whether a municipality engaged in an ongoing violation of the Constitution is immune from declaratory and other prospective relief in an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 in the absence of a separate, express determination that the constitutional violation stems from a municipal policy or custom

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1. Where officer of the court submitted intentionally false and . misleading claims of "meet and confer" not privilege to obtain this Court's decision in Williams v. County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Social Services, et al., (2014), is Petitioner bound to plead and prove that the officer of the court committed the crime of perjury in order to bring an independent action for : fraud upon the court? 2. Whether a municipality engaged in an ongoing violation of the Constitution is immune from declaratory and other prospective relief in an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 in the absence of a separate, express determination that the constitutional violation stems from a municipal policy or custom? ;