Did the State of Arkansas, Tennessee and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania violate the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act by not following Federal laws on extradition process?

Questions Presented ; Did the State of Arkansas, Tennessee and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania violate the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act by not following Federal laws on extradition process? Did the Pennsylvania “Supreme Court, by not applying their precedent as to Art. 4 § 2 — ¢eb2, which they claim to be bound by procedurally default Writ of Habeas Corpus by allowing the District Attorney to defeat the Writ and not ordering Hearing on issue which ‘ is not on record? . . ; The Pennsylvania Supreme Court was passed this question: So ; \f extradition was unlawful and petitioner was forcibly seized and placed into Involuntary : Servitude by the District Attorney of Cumberland County, Court of Common Pleas of . . Cumberland County, and the Department of Corrections, made to work for slave wages, : did this amount to Human Trafficking? , Did the United States Court of Appeals for Third Circuit of Pennsylvania misapply and/or procedurally default 28 U.S.C. 2244 (b)(2) by stating petitioner did not make Prima | Facie showing of his claim by Due Diligence? . Is the appropriate inquiry into whether the claimed error of law [is] “a fundamental defect , which inherently results in a complete miscarriage of justice” and does it present . exceptional circumstances for a Writ of Habeas Corpus? ,