No. 18-5108
Jaime Davila-Reyes, aka Peluche, aka Pai, aka Jaime, aka Chezina v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-sentencing dismissed-charges due-process judicial-discretion preponderance-of-evidence sentencing sentencing-reasonableness substantive-reasonableness unproven-allegations
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's sentence was substantively unreasonable because the district court violated due process when it enhanced Petitioner's sentence based on unproven allegations, dismissed charges and arrests without proof by a preponderance of the evidence that the underlying conduct occurred
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 2, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent