No. 18-5114
Nigel L. Faison v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process jurisdiction plea-bargaining sentencing sentencing-guidelines standing statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in accepting the petitioner's guilty plea without a sufficient factual basis, in violation of due process
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DOD Yecewm gapped when it Qoted be pete 7 Chala a ples ty hua tidatay due fo Was udbbrchus 4 foe ten bases. ® YCCA eria_d Whoa Ff Pun to Hat heesree t drug ef“ HE att. batren did Ao f Ge ust ta he a 50 Pew f Prevdare! oF Tl ghia a : tsres,
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent