No. 18-5115
Stanley Lee Hayward v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aggravated-assault crime-of-violence due-process equal-protection essential-elements habeas-corpus sentencing-guidelines statute
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower tribunal abused its discretion in denying petitioner the right to due process and equal protection of law in holding that his prior 1985 conviction for aggravated assault is a crime of violence absent the essential elements of the crime statute
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE LOWER TRIBUNAL ABUSED IT'S DISCRETION IN DENYING | PETITIONER THE RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW | IN HOLDING THAT HIS PRIOR 1985 CONVICTION FOR AGGRAVATED ASS| : AULT IS A CRIME OF VIOLENCE ABSENT THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF | == ss THE CRIME STATUTE. . in oo : | | I | INTERESTED PARTIES The following are the
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-07-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent