Whether the First Circuit Court of Appeals erred in dismissing petitioner's claims under the Takings Clause and Due Process Clause

No question identified. : 5 + — £.& & ¢ By NI, Gc Ls oO. Bd 4 Ww “Osx < 30 Ce 5 fh VP|Q2A¢ “A bes &S4 4% ye FTE Fy sLt 22 8s cam) ; ‘ 4 Sr mee! oS 2a ~d a = a, PQer CZd Tos se" as NY os as : SF Se 5) a= ASE oe af Zo — GS 4 S : ae “$4 BPH ses 80 ‘8 : | al | ie aE 3-2 “Ot e3g Si Be us “rte 8 ee d2 £ 8 A 2<3 Eg £ : i, 3,78 {ez Nag B48 B84 B55 y “Sey 207 o tad Fw N20 UF § <= < v 0 AY 58S zo | Bitg 3b0? 2 SS eee ors ett 48.4 +4F2 See ¢S5 EF a4 3 "cds 2 ye Sess ge? oc rN eek P 8 frets aS O52 5 evs #259 SK 3 goa 60g 2 47 $< woe Re . 5 yoo ms n gy 2 ~»d K&N $ ce Se PSL e@ A a~ £ NYP = S g5-= zs . -YF-= 3 wes Ne So8 or ; SP 43 3 om . ak ~ FS ~ Pare fac BoB ROE gh Ze 27S eee) 3 5 "> 3 2 3 par fa eUS 4eo g3p 7 23 a > & nA aX V+ S B ¥¢ 58 £24 FEF By 4, se8 en se Tags NaN 3 o.S S 3 2% 245 0 wv wp vee s o = . _ QQ _— SH i, 7 % : S nd ERT ES ze 2.3 3 vw oOS p wae "AR 2 hy $ 222 3 7 YS gy dD 5 EG w2°S BE °3 8 8 as 22 yh 3 BF