Whether the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. 16(b) is unconstitutionally void for vagueness under Johnson v. United States and whether 18 U.S.C. 16(b) can be used to define a crime of violence under D.C. Code state law

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Lynch v. Dimaya, No. 15-1498, 2016 WL 3232911 (U.S. Sept. 29, 2016), to determine whether the identical language in the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. == ==16(6) .is unconstitutionally void after Johnson and whether 18 U.S.C. 16(b) supply the definition of a crime of violence for D.C. Code state law as previously held in United States v. Barahona 2014 D.C. Super. LEXIS 19 (D.C. 2014)? . ;